Priceless

On Knowing the Price of Everything and the Value of Nothing

A timely and much needed corrective to the current infatuation with cost benefit analysis and the derelict logic used to defend it

“A damning indictment of cost-benefit analysis applied to health and environmental protection.”
—Robert F. Kennedy Jr.

As clinical as it sounds to express the value of human lives, health, or the environment in cold dollars and cents, cost-benefit analysis requires it. More disturbingly, this approach is being embraced by a growing number of politicians and conservative pundits as the most reasonable way to make many policy decisions regarding public health and the environment.

By systematically refuting the economic algorithms and illogical assumptions that cost-benefit analysts flaunt as fact, Priceless tells a “gripping story about how solid science has been shoved to the backburner by bean counters with ideological blinders” (In These Times). Ackerman and Heinzerling argue that decisions about health and safety should be made “to reflect not economists’ numbers, but democratic values, chosen on moral grounds. This is a vividly written book, punctuated by striking analogies, a good deal of outrage, and a nice dose of humor” (Cass Sunstein, The New Republic).

Essential reading for anyone concerned with the future of human health and environmental protection, Priceless “shines a bright light on obstacles that stand in the way of good government decisions” (Public Citizen News).

Praise

“As Frank Ackerman and Lisa Heinzerling point out . . . it is hardly clear why the same logic [of short term investments] should apply to the value of our great-grandchildren.”
—Jim Holt, The New York Times Magazine
“If you've ever wondered where some really bad ideas—more arsenic in your water, say—could have come from, this book will provide the answers.”
—Bill McKibben, author of The End of Nature
“Ackerman and Heinzerling combine sophisticated criticism and a provocative policy perspective with an accessible style and an eye for contemporary political issues.”
Harvard Law Review